Sorry, I should have mentioned that in my original post.  I tested this out
with some of the framework patches also.  The patches I tested do apply
fine after the move to git.

Tom




                                                                       
  From:       Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]>                   
                                                                       
  To:         P2 developer discussions <[email protected]>            
                                                                       
  Date:       07/07/2011 07:13 AM                                      
                                                                       
  Subject:    Re: [p2-dev] Pending patches in preparation to Git move  
                                                                       





I checked and the patches provided for these projects just apply fine!
Thx Paul, this saves quite some pain :)

On 2011-07-07, at 12:41 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:

      Ok great. I'll try with the test repo that Kim had created and will
      report.
      On 2011-07-07, at 12:23 PM, Paul Webster wrote:

            On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Pascal Rapicault <
            [email protected]> wrote:
              In preparation for the move of p2 to a git repo (see Tom's
              mail from yesterday), I have been thinking about releasing
              large pending patches into separate branches in CVS so that
              they are automatically carried over into the new git repo,
              and thus saves the author some nightmare related to dealing
              with reapplying the patch. What do you think about this?

            Once your git repo is online and the projects imported into
            your workspace, the patches *should* apply from within eclipse
            just as before.

            If you commit them to CVS in a branch for the effected
            projects,  the tool we use to convert cvs2git creates a "delete
            commit" at the base of the branch to get rid of anything not
            tagged and branched from CVS.  This could make a merge on the
            git side painful, and might force you to cherrypick your commit
            across (just an inconvenience, I know).

            Later,
            PW

            --
            Paul Webster
            Hi floor.  Make me a sammich! - GIR
            _______________________________________________
            p2-dev mailing list
            [email protected]
            https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

Reply via email to