The idea by creating a non incubating repo is that the parties interested in the code will take it from the incubating status into a production ready one.
On 2012-08-23, at 12:51 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: > You can make as many repositories as you'd like in with a project. Divide the > repositories up as much as you'd like (as much as makes sense for you and the > community). Having the functionality in a separate repository in the > incubator will certainly make it much easier to move to the proper project > when the time comes. Separating different functional/experimental areas into > separate Git repositories makes a lot of sense to me. YMMV. > > If somebody wants to use incubating code in production, that's their choice. > The incubation flag is your warning to the community; they may choose to > ignore those warnings. > > My outsider opinion is that moving this functionality into a separate > repository is a net win if you can turn the adopters into > contributors/committers. > > Wayne > > On 08/23/2012 07:54 AM, Pascal Rapicault wrote: >> >> There is of course a matter of repo size, but more importantly is the fact >> that the code is in an incubation repository where they want to use it in >> production. >> On 2012-08-23, at 1:47 AM, Ian Bull wrote: >> >>> No problem here, but is the issue that the incubator repository (I assume >>> it's a single repo) is too large / complex? If so, then moving it to the >>> p2 repo won't help much (as you said) :-). >>> >>> cheers, >>> ian >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Thanks for your interest in p2CUDF. Moving it out of where it is located >>> should not be too much of an issue. >>> I will discuss with the others if they prefer having the code moved into a >>> specific git repo or merged with the existing p2 repo, and will check with >>> the foundation if any process needs to be followed. >>> For the repo structure, given how large the p2 repository is (both in size >>> and number of projects) I'm in favour of creating a specific repo. Ian, >>> Tom, any problems with that? >>> >>> Pascal >>> >>> >>> On 2012-08-20, at 4:44 AM, Adrien Lecharpentier wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> For an open-source project named DORM, we would like to use the library >>>> p2cudf from the incubation repository. >>>> It would be great for this project to be hosted in its own repository git >>>> or svn so we could easily use it and maybe contribute to it. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> -- Adrien >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> Adrien Lecharpentier >>>> Consultant et Formateur >>>> Zenika, Paris >>>> >>>> Tél: +33 (0)6 28 55 08 51 >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Skype: adrien.lecharpentier >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> p2-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 >>> http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> p2-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > -- > Wayne Beaton > The Eclipse Foundation > Twitter: @waynebeaton > Explore Eclipse Projects > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
