Hi Robin,
I don't know how you would apply it to complementary currencies but
various versions of the arrangements you outline have been in place for
17 years in The Independent Practitioner Network [IPN]
<http://i-p-n.org/> that I belong to in the UK. Smaller groups than you
mention, 5-8, meet every six weeks or so. Their task is get to know each
other well enough to be able to 'stand by' their work with clients (a
reputation 'metric'?). For me the strong version of this derives from
'self and peer assessment' <http://www.human-inquiry.com/asre.htm> based
on a list of mutually agreed criteria, which is what you seem to be
suggesting.
I have written about this extensively, see my forthcoming book Therapy
Futures <http://www.pccs-books.co.uk/products/therapy-futures/#> and
previously Regulating the psychological therapies.
<http://www.pccs-books.co.uk/products/regulating-the-psychological-therapies-from-taxonomy-to-taxidermy/#.UF63CVEpXnj>
In my experience your assumption...
... that self-determination, that is, autonomy (intrinsic motivation),
relatedness and competence is vital for social justice where for
individuals to be self-determining, everyone else must be self-determining.
...is very sound.
A critical other dimension is that the distribution of power is
constantly under scrutiny, ie that dominance and subordination are
eliminated. This doesn't mean that hierarchies of experience and skill
are eliminated but that decision making is consensual. A tough task this
since domination often seems to me to be in the grain of the times.
I hope this helps
Denis
denisATpostle.net
On 23/09/2012 01:00, robin wrote:
Hi All
I am researching (via a PhD with the University of Tasmania) the idea
of a reputation metric as a currency in a complementary currency
project to test whether it would increase trust and other prosocial
behaviours in local communities but most importantly to scale up trust
between people that don't know each other. What ideas do people have
about how you would structure a reputation metric in practice? My
vague ideas at the moment are that you could have resilience circles,
small groups of 20 to 30 people who would meet once a month. They
would act as support for each other, but also the group would allocate
a score for individuals over the previous month based on set criteria
for how each have exchanged with other people whether in the group or
with others in different groups against the criteria which would
attempt to vaguely measure autonomy, competence and relatedness. My
research is based on the assumption that self-determination, that is,
autonomy (intrinsic motivation), relatedness and competence is vital
for social justice where for individuals to be self-determining,
everyone else must be self-determining.
Any advice appreciated, eg are there are other groups that I could
this to that might be relevant? Do I need to supply more information?
Thanks & regards
Robin
/Robin Krabbe/
/President - North-West Environment Centre/
/Convenor - Community Exchange North-West Environment Centre (CENTs)/
/
/
/P.O. Box 999/
/Burnie, TAS, Australia 7320/
/
/
/1022 Oldina Road/
/Oldina, TAS, Australia 7325/
/
/
/Ph. 03 6438 1454/
/Mob. 0421 461 724/
/Fax. 03 6438 1455/
/[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>/
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
--
/THERAPY FUTURES/ - Obstacles and Opportunities - Introducing the psyCommons
pre-order fromPCCS Books <http://www.pccs-books.co.uk/>
The Mind Gymnasium FREE ebook Library <http://www.mind-gymnasium.com/>
A unique digital resource for Personal and Professional development
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
