Alexander wrote: >Please note also, to the best of my knowledge, there is still no >published NAT traversal scheme, comparable on its quality to, say, >Hamachi. Published NAT traversal mechanisms, like ICE, lacks some >important knowledge, critical for the high-probability NAT traversal.
Am I mistaken, but STUN and STUNT claim to penetrate almost 100/90% (respectively) percents of various NAT combinations? Am I missing something here? http://nutss.gforge.cis.cornell.edu//pub/imc05-tcpnat.pdf _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
