Dear all, I'd like to know what type of experiences you have about the rate of succesfull direct communications (without relaying) of peers behind NAT, both for TCP and UDP and for different scenarios, like home and corporate users. There are some results reported like the one for STUNT ( http://nutss.net/pub/imc05-tcpnat.pdf), which says that "TCP NAT Traversal can work 85%-90% of the time" ( http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/midcom/current/msg03848.html). However, other reports don't seem to be so encouraging, like http://www.paradial.com/storage/Elements/CallCompletion.pdf.
What are the best approaches for TCP and UDP? STUN, STUNT, ICE,....? The thing is that we need peers to establish direct communication (no realying) for both TCP and UDPand I like to know the best approaches to do that and the best existing solutions for that. Thanks Carlos -- "There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about." John von Neumann
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
