On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Russ Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess my question is, should I go back and look for bugs in my > implementation, or should I tune the encoding parameters to minimize > the number of these "useless" blocks?
If a check block is providing no extra information about the resulting data, then it really is useless. It's interesting that you're seeing many more such blocks when the number of message blocks increases (the actually sizes should be inconsequential). It's been too long since I've looked at online codes to have a good feeling about weather this is a bug in your code or a flaw in the design. If the latter is does seem to be something which should be improved. AGL -- Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.imperialviolet.org _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
