Dear all, I'm struggling a bit to differentiate the two terms. More specifically:
** Given a fault, what are the differences of a (P2P) system being tolerant of that fault and being resilient to that fault. ** My take of it is that from the system's structure point of view, being resilient is more to do with how the system recovers from the fault. On the other hand, designing the system to be fault tolerant places more restrictions and requirements of the performance in the worst-case scenarios. I'm sure many of you may think differently. Regards, Anh. _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
