What about UDT? Or is there some other reason to run actual TCP over non-IP datagrams?
-david On 11/27/2010 03:54 PM, Alex Pankratov wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: p2p-hackers-boun...@lists.zooko.com >> [mailto:p2p-hackers-boun...@lists.zooko.com] On Behalf Of Ian G >> Sent: November 27, 2010 3:25 PM >> To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks >> Cc: Jérôme Prudent >> Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] p2p-hackers Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8 >> >> On 28/11/10 5:38 AM, Jérôme Prudent wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Sorry for the off topic (and the stupidity of the >> question), but could >>> you briefly explain me what's wrong with the use of UDP? >> >> >> Only that it isn't used enough :) >> >> http://iang.org/ssl/reliable_connections_are_not.html >> >> iang > > This reminds me - does anyone know of a userspace TCP library that > can be put on top of arbitrary datagram carrier, and not just IP? > Clearly this can be accomplished by forking and adapting BSD (or > license permitting - Linux) stack, but I'm looking for something > readily available, and preferably in C. Yes, and a pony :) > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
