I've written an article about this topic. You can find it  here : 
http://bit.ly/dM2acH

Petrucci

From: g...@krypto.org
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:19:39 -0800
To: p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] Google cheating on TCP slow start



On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ray Dillinger <b...@sonic.net> wrote:


On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:59 -0700, David Barrett wrote:

> Interesting article:

>

> http://blog.benstrong.com/2010/11/google-and-microsoft-cheat-on-slow.html

>

> I know a lot of people on this list are interested in this topic.  But

> I'm curious: if all sites were to start adopting *ahem* "alternative"

> congestion strategies like this, would would the real-world

> ramifications be?  Indeed, it seems reasonable to assume that before

> long it'll be a standard Apache option to do what Google does.

>

> Is this the end of the gentleman's internet?  Should ISPs detect and

> block/throttle this behavior -- essentially punishing (or overriding)

> this type of behavior to re-establish normalcy?

>

> -david





FWIW, I'm in favor of anything that reduces the number of roundtrips.

While I see the rationale behind the slow-start algorithm in HTTP, the

initial window size (and packet size) currently in use is ridiculous.



Google is right that the IW size should be increased to (at least) 10

packets. I think I'd have gone for 32 actually.  Someone should write

an RFC to change it.

Google and others are working on doing just that.  
http://www.google.com/research/pubs/pub36640.html

 


This reflects the current reality that network latency has become by

far the limiting factor on speed; it's not (or it's rarely) the size

of data being transmitted that limits speed anymore; it's mainly the

number of roundtrip delays.



Skipping the slow-start algorithm all together as MS is doing is

dubious at best, though.



                                Bear









_______________________________________________

p2p-hackers mailing list

p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com

http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers




_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers                             
          
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to