> You're talking about using a "cut out" here. That carries with all of the > issues it does in the physical world.
Sorry if I've misunderstood, but in the physical world, wouldn't the publisher be able to identify the cut out, who could identify the source? What I'm suggesting is that the source should try to remain anonymous to the redactor (possibly without success), and the redactor should try to remain anonymous to the publisher (with a greater chance of success, since both can be trained in the use of anonymity tools). It's not a silver bullet of course, just a way of working around the problem of training all possible leakers in the use of anonymity tools. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
