> Could you briefly summarize the main differences with other well-known > event-driven simulators like PeerSim ?
Our simulator, DVN, was built to support back-porting of C implementations of deployed protocol code into virtual nodes for the simulator. To do so, it exposes a transport API in C (datagram only for now, but streams are in the work), and supports tracking of global variables that might have been used in the original protocol implementation. I think that PeerSim exposes a Java API. DVN also supports parallel simulations with a conservative scheduler, but it allows worker processes to run ahead for a window that has been deemed safe. Those are some differences off the top of my head. There's more in terms of feature list and related simulators in the technical report. Of course, please let us know if we've missed something or if there are suggested improvements. Thanks. Denis _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
