> At this moment I'm parasiting other protocols like a dedicated PubNub > channel or using anonimous XMPP servers, but it feels fairly > hackerish. At a first though (and ideally) I wanted to use SIP, but > there are no anonimous public servers. Also I though about using STUN > servers as a gateway to interchange the WebP2P SDP strings, but it was > a no way. > > Ideally, it would be something little where to announce and receive > the connections, something like a reverse dynamic DNS or similar... In > fact, using websockets, the first testing servers I was using before > change to PubNub and XMPP were only about 100 lines of Node.js code > with comments... > > >> I suppose each pair could simply agree according to some previous >> arrangement. Or we could imagine some protocol that synchronises a new >> location for each circumstance, sort of like radio frequency hopping or >> SecureId time prediction. >> > This was one of my ideas when I started to parasite other protocols, > so there would be several services available and you would pick and > connect to any of them so it would be more dificult to bring it > down... ;-) Unlucklily I didn't find much of them... :-/ > We've actually implemented some sort of "private" and spam resistant user discovery for XMPP a while ago, which could help (nothing fancy, was initially intended as profile discovery and profile migration sevice for diaspora or a diaspora-like service..). It's unpublished as of now, but we'd be happy to share...
>> If you want such a thing to be done, don't create a committee. OTOH, if >> you don't want it to be done, then by all means creating a committee is >> a fine way to achieve this ;-) ACK. Build a prototype and find people who like it ;) -- t _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
