On 19/04/16 18:53, David Barrett wrote: > Re: Michael - Great point. One solution to the "two atomic increments > of the same value" problem is to just ROLLBACK the 2nd transaction and > re-run it after the first batch completes committing. This way > non-conflicting transactions can safely commit at the same time, while > conflicting transactions remain serialized. Do you agree this would > solve that problem?
Yup, sounds like it would work! Cheers, Michael
0x9FC527CC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
