Dear all, El lun, 25-05-2015 a las 14:13 +0500, Ilshat Shakirov escribió: > Malicious peers will be smart and they can perform different > types of attacks. > Keep in main that the goal is to check the efficiency of > STrPe and STrPe-DS against those type of attacks. > > The first step is to implement STrPe. I think that the malicious peer > which will just send poisoned chunk (000..00) is enough for evaluating > STrPe. (am I right?)
Yes, that's the first step, sending poisoned chunk to the rest. But malicious peer is supposed to be smart, trying to avoid policies or colluding with others... In any case, STrPe-DS is more interesting in a real scenario. > > > We have to agree about what experiments (number of malicious > peers, type of attacks, etc) are needed to check the results > and your code. > > It's ok. I will prepare plan asap. Thanks. > It is rare the system go down for 5-10 sec. What is the > environment you are checking it? > > MacOS (yosemite); I run splitter, monitor and peer. When system is > going to down, the vlc out the error messages like *can't decode > timestamp. > But it occurs from time to time, ie today morning all was ok =) And I > just check it again, all was ok. I use Linux. Best, Leo
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
