Hi Ilshat, are you using the commands I can see in your blog?
Regards, Vi. On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:59 PM Ilshat Shakirov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all! > > Here is new blogpost: > http://shakirov-dev.blogspot.ru/2015/06/the-third-week.html > > Also, I want you to test my code please. There is strange errors > sometimes. After monitor is connected, it doesnt receive new chunks from > splitter. And after the trusted peer is connected to team, monitor exclude > it from team for 129 losses. It occurs sometimes, and I can't understand > why it's happening. > > Thanks! > > 2015-06-20 5:05 GMT+05:00 Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo < > [email protected]>: > >> FYI: >> >> https://torrentfreak.com/popular-torrents-being-sabotaged-by-ipv6-peer-flood-150619/ >> >> >> Le 18 juin 2015 19:41:12 CEST, Ilshat Shakirov <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >>> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> Sorry for the delay in the response. >>> >>> -On replacing CRC32 for SHA-256. ... >>>> >>> Ok, thanks for the explanation. >>> >>> Overriding sendto() function ... >>>> >>> Thanks =) >>> >>> -Packet verification frequency (the 255 problem). >>>> >>> Ok, I will do it as you described. >>> >>> -Malicious peers sending packets even after expelled. ... >>>> >>> I will return to this task after implementing the first steps in >>> STrPe-DS. >>> >>> Regarding testing crypto-libs: >>> I have performed that tests, here is results: >>> >>>> MacBookPro-Ilya-Shakirov:crypto-test i.shakirov$ ./test-ecdsa.py >>>> key.sign x100 times: 2.76373291016s >>>> key.verify x100 times: 5.61430811882s >>>> MacBookPro-Ilya-Shakirov:crypto-test i.shakirov$ ./test-pycrypto.py >>>> key.sign x100 times: 0.0404751300812s >>>> key.verify x100 times: 0.038027048111s >>>> >>> My laptop config is i7 2.9GHz; 8Gb RAM; >>> Source of this synth-tests can be found here: >>> https://github.com/ishakirov/p2psp/commit/d833589ffc5a9a923123c56a74bc0bba2a79c97a >>> >>> I think that pycrypto lib is suitable for our needs in speed. So Im >>> planning to use it in STrPe-DS implementation. >>> >>> PS. Sorry for 3rd week blogpost, but I think there is too small results >>> to write blogpost. But 4th week blogspot will be. =) >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> 2015-06-15 11:19 GMT+05:00 Vicente Gonzalez < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi everybody! >>>> >>>> Just a little remark to this long but insightful message (thanks Juan >>>> Alvaro). >>>> >>>> First, yes, using DS should be the definitive solution, but, regarding >>>> this: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:04 PM Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> all peers behind the same public IP (NAT scenario) will be banned if >>>>> one of them is malicious >>>>> >>>> >>>> It the EMS set of rules is implemented, more than one peer can be in >>>> the same private network and all are different for the splitter. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Vi. >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Vicente González Ruiz >>>> Depto de Informática >>>> Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería >>>> Universidad de Almería >>>> >>>> Carretera Sacramento S/N >>>> 04120, La Cañada de San Urbano >>>> Almería, España >>>> >>>> e-mail: [email protected] >>>> http://www.ual.es/~vruiz >>>> tel: +34 950 015711 >>>> fax: +34 950 015486 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp >>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail. >> > > -- -- Vicente González Ruiz Depto de Informática Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Universidad de Almería Carretera Sacramento S/N 04120, La Cañada de San Urbano Almería, España e-mail: [email protected] http://www.ual.es/~vruiz tel: +34 950 015711 fax: +34 950 015486
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
