On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 PM Max Mertens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Vicente, > > Thanks for providing this link. > The documentation now splits up NTS into Restricted NAT Traversal and > Symmetric NAT Traversal set of rules, so I suppose I should create two > distinct classes as well, and rename the current NTS into RTS. The second > part of NAT Traversal will then be implemented as STS classes, probably > subclassing RTS and extending them by port prediction. > > That's only an idea. In general most people will use both set of rules at the same time (RTS and STS), but I thought that it could help in your work (STS can be seen as an intermediate milestone). The script is now functional, you can have a look at it in the repo [1]. It > outputs a table with "yes" if the two peers can send packets to each other, > and "no" else. Now I have a automatic and reliable way to test NAT > Traversal between peers, and can apply it on different implementations > (though the script takes about 5 minutes to run, to ensure that the stream > can be buffered completely for each configuration). > > The results differ a bit from the ones I got so far, as now in the test I > make a distinction between monitor and peer, and which type of NAT each of > them is behind. The resulting tables are included at the bottom. > I will send a pull request for the nts_doc branch when the documentation > for the Virtual Machine setup and for the test itself is ready. > > Regards, > Max > > [1] > https://github.com/jellysheep/p2psp/blob/nts_doc/tools/test_NAT_traversal.sh > > Monitor_LRS, Peer_FNS, Splitter_LRS (master branch, commit fafca93): > > Mon\Peer| fcn | rcn | prcn | sym > ========================================== > fcn | yes | yes | yes | yes > rcn | yes | yes | yes | yes > prcn | no | no | no | no > sym | no | no | no | no > > Monitor_NTS, Peer_NTS, Splitter_NTS (nts branch, commit 1b844e4): > > Mon\Peer| fcn | rcn | prcn | sym > ========================================== > fcn | yes | yes | yes | yes > rcn | yes | yes | yes | yes > prcn | yes | yes | yes | no > sym | no | no | no | no > > OK, a question. ¿Why is more dificult to deal with a monitor peer than with a standard peer? Regards, Vi. -- -- Vicente González Ruiz Depto de Informática Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Universidad de Almería Carretera Sacramento S/N 04120, La Cañada de San Urbano Almería, España e-mail: [email protected] http://www.ual.es/~vruiz tel: +34 950 015711 fax: +34 950 015486
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
