Hi Juan Pablo, On 27.06.2015 18:18, JP wrote: > Well, I can understand the warning said in [3] but, taking into > account that both solutions do not seem too much "pure", from the > traditional point of view of the OOP, your proposal Max is much more > elegant and simple. Good idea. Ok, thanks. Also I think the implications mentioned there do not affect the P2PSP code, as it is very clean and does not rely on those special semantics of Python. Another possible implementation would be overriding __getattr__ and delegating methods to base classes, but then for each peer there would exist multiple instances as well.
Regards, Max -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
