One remarkable result here is the fact that having a second trusted peer > does not have a real impact on malicious peer expulsion. I realize now that > this is due to how the Str technique is designed. Not for GSoC, but maybe > we should think of a evolution of the protocol that reflected the > aggregation of trusted peers. Cristóbal, that might be intersting if it has > not been researched yet. >
But adding second trusted peer accelerates the expulsion of attackers, you can see it in the last graphs (-m 50 -t 1 and -m 50 -t 2) : in the case of one trusted there not all attackers were expelled from the team for given time, and in the second case - all attackers were expelled by ~100 round. Ok let me rephrase like this: the addition of a second trusted peer has little impact. The speed at which expulsions are done is comparable, and for the 1 trusted peer case the remaining malicious peers are 1 or 2 at most. But you're right, having 2 peers eliminates all malicious peers in all cases, which is already a remarkable result ;) Can't wait to see what happens with 4 and 8! Juan
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
