At 12:57 PM 9/20/2002 -0400, Stephen Adkins wrote:
....
>However, I think the right strategy to achieve this is to allow
>people who do Enterprise Development in perl (or know how to and aspire to)
>collect into groups with a more-or-less consistent way of handling
>enterprise development problems.
....
>However, what is needed to become a P5EE Group is core member(s) who
>are willing to pull together (or write) components in a coherent
>architecture which increasingly satisfy all of the requirements
>of enterprise systems
(http://www.officevision.com/pub/p5ee/definitions.html),
>*document this architecture*, and promote this architecture by 
>supporting users of this architecture through the P5EE mailing list.
....
>What do people think about this?
>Are there others who want to step forward to form other P5EE Groups?

OK.

Well in light of all the interesting feedback, I'll be proceeding with
this plan and recasting the P5EE web site in this new light of
"P5EE diversity".

If in the future any of you want to head up a P5EE Group, let us all know.

Stephen


Reply via email to