On Jan 11, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-01-11T18:54:21, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
they're in heartbeat-resources
though i'm not 100% sure breaking them out into their own package
is a
good idea. thoughts?
I'm kind of disagree. Without them CRM is almost useless,
well in theory the Red Hat (or anyone else) could supply their own
set of
RAs which could be used instead
They belong into heartbeat-resources, that's fine.
so I'd put them into pacemaker-openais.
Even if I wanted to (which I'm not convinced I do), there are
political
problems with doing so and we would start having double maintenance
issues.
If anything, I'd merge heartbeat-resources with heartbeat-common.
No, I think they should remain separate. Clearly they don't belong
into
pacemaker-ais, as they can be used w/o pacemaker as well.
(I know this is not your interest, but for the Linux HA project in
"legacy mode" it matters, once Alan gets over the split itself.)
Just to be clear, if that was directed at me, I agree that they should
not be part of pacemaker (which is why they are not part of the source
tree).
Apologies if "which I'm not convinced I do" wasn't clear enough in
that respect - I was merely playing devil's advocate.
And I tend to agree about them being in heartbeat-resources... though
its largely an academic point anyway.
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@clusterlabs.org
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
