On Sep 17, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-09-17T10:12:10, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks that way. I can't find anything about STONITH in the CIB.
Btw. this is mostly deliberate.
Stonithd was designed so that the CRM/PE could be completely
ignorant of
the fencing topology and configuration.
Would be nice though if there was some representation of in-flight
ops.
You mean stonith ones? Because we can already show resource actions.
...
I wonder if there was a way how the tools could hook into the TE (I
know
its folded into crmd) and show the status of an in-progress
transition?
I am so going to hurt you :-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar
Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
