On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:57 -0600, David Teigland wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> > I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git >> > and rgmanager.git in another. >> > But I may be missing some of the interdependencies. >> >> I wouldn't mind either of those combinations. Maybe rgmanager's last >> stand will be in cluster.git anyway... if so, then it's not a factor. >> >> I didn't have much reason for separating fence/fence-agents. We're >> planning on unifying it all anyway, even if the agents are done sooner. >> And I don't think packaging/releasing agents separately should have much >> bearing on the source tree? (I've heard interest in putting agents in >> their own package for Fedora.) >> >> Dave >> > > There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated. > > Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to > go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit.
True. Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together? Similar things with similar update frequencies... Just an idea. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@clusterlabs.org http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
