On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
is this an intended behavior?
yes
if so, can you please elaborate why?
(not a priority of course).
let me ask a question back, why would it need to be somewhere else?
i would not expect a node in standby to play *any* active role in the
cluster. this, imho, applies to being a dc too.
nope.
and you didnt really answer the question. what benefit is there to
designating another node as DC?
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
