On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Florian Haas <flor...@linbit.com> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On 2009-05-25 19:56, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Steven Dake writes:
>>  > The only options I see is to periodically try the failed ring for
>>  > liveness.  The problem with this approach is it is hard to implement.
>>
>> try all the time also after failure like was done before failure.
>
> Complete Totem amateur behind the keyboard, but I'd second that. Since
> you're constantly checking the link status while it's up, why not keep
> doing so after it's gone down, to see if it has recovered?

Perhaps even at a decreased (user configurable) interval/rate.

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Reply via email to