On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Florian Haas <flor...@linbit.com> wrote: > Steve, > > On 2009-05-25 19:56, Juha Heinanen wrote: >> Steven Dake writes: >> > The only options I see is to periodically try the failed ring for >> > liveness. The problem with this approach is it is hard to implement. >> >> try all the time also after failure like was done before failure. > > Complete Totem amateur behind the keyboard, but I'd second that. Since > you're constantly checking the link status while it's up, why not keep > doing so after it's gone down, to see if it has recovered?
Perhaps even at a decreased (user configurable) interval/rate. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker