2009/7/22  <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
>> If the crmd dies, then I (IIRC) the lrmd cancels all existing resource
>> monitoring.
>> However, when the crmd is recovered, it should setup the resource
>> monitoring again.
>>
>> Is the second part not happening?
>
> There are some patterns in a problem.
>
> When crmd/stonithd restarts in a ACT node in a DC node, the monitor 
> completely stops.
> When others of lrmd/mgmtd restart in the STB node of the DC node, the monitor 
> completely stops.

Can you open a bug for that.
I suspect the lrmd might be doing the wrong thing, but assign it to
pacemaker until I can prove that :-)

>> > 1) When a process related to a monitor fell, a system reboots.(Emergency 
>> > Reboot)
>> Thats the lazy way out.
>
> I think your opinion is right.
> If a monitor is reopened definitely, I think that the Emergency reboot is not 
> necessary.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> 2009/7/17  <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>:
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> >> What do you mean by monitor here?
>> >> Do you mean that pacemaker would no longer detect if those two processes 
>> >> died?
>> >
>> > This monitor means the monitor of the resource.
>> > When these processes fall, the monitor of the resource of lrmd/stonithd 
>> > stops.
>> > For example, the monitor of external/ssh and pgsql stops.
>> >
>> >> Do you mean the way heartbeat behaves with "crm on" instead of "crm 
>> >> respawn" ?
>> >
>> > I do not understand this meaning well.
>>
>> That makes two of us :-)
>> I'm not sure I really understand the problem here.
>>
>> If the crmd dies, then I (IIRC) the lrmd cancels all existing resource
>> monitoring.
>> However, when the crmd is recovered, it should setup the resource
>> monitoring again.
>>
>> Is the second part not happening?
>>
>> >
>> > I think that the following approach is necessary.
>> >
>> > 1) When a process related to a monitor fell, a system reboots.(Emergency 
>> > Reboot)
>>
>> Thats the lazy way out.
>>
>> > 2) When a process related to a monitor fell, a monitor does not stop even 
>> > if it reboot.
>> >
>> > The first approach thinks that realization is simple.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> >
>> > --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:34 AM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > We began shift investigation to the combination of Pacemaker and 
>> >> > corosync/openais now.
>> >> >
>> >> > We put Pacemaker and openais(whitetank) together and confirmed movement 
>> >> > at the time of the
>> >> process
>> >> > trouble.
>> >> > (This is the function that a reboot emergency occurred by a combination 
>> >> > with Heartbeat.)
>> >> >
>> >> > I let a process of Pacemaker break down. (kill -9 pid)
>> >> > The following behavior was seen then.
>> >> >
>> >> > * When crmd reboots on ACT node(Not DC), the monitor of the lrmd 
>> >> > resource stops.
>> >> >  And the monitor of the stonnith resource stops.
>> >>
>> >> What do you mean by monitor here?
>> >> Do you mean that pacemaker would no longer detect if those two processes 
>> >> died?
>> >>
>> >> > * When stonithd reboots on ACT node(Not DC), the monitor of the 
>> >> > stonnith resource stops.
>> >> > * When crmd reboots on STB node(DC), the monitor of the stonnith 
>> >> > resource stops.
>> >> > * When pengine reboots on STB node(DC), the monitor of the stonnith 
>> >> > resource stops.
>> >> > * And more....
>> >> >
>> >> > We feel a problem for the stop of the monitor after the process reboot.
>> >> > When we combined openais/corosync, we hope a function such as the 
>> >> > urgent reboot of
>> Heartbeat
>> >> to be
>> >> > included.
>> >>
>> >> Do you mean the way heartbeat behaves with "crm on" instead of "crm 
>> >> respawn" ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Pacemaker mailing list
>> >> > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pacemaker mailing list
>> >> Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list
>> > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Reply via email to