On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Colin <colin....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Colin <colin....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> # crm configure delete <resource-id> >>>> >>>> Thanks, that did the trick — it recursively deletes everything >>>> connected to the resource. >>>> >>>> Wonder why crm_resource —delete doesn't do the same thing… >>> >>> Its not trying to be clever. >>> It does only what you ask it to do. >> >> So what is the conceptual difference between asking to delete a >> resource via "crm configure delete" and via "crm_resource —delete"? > > One magically deletes everything. > The other just tries to delete what you tell it to.
Let me rephrase that question: Why do two interfaces for one and the same thing behave differently? There must be some conceptional rationale... >> (Is there any case where the latter will actually work?) > > Yes, when there are no constraints referencing the resource. Ok, it's the constraints, not the dynamic part of the cib. Thanks, Colin _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
