On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:23:37AM +0100, Patrick Zwahlen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a simple active/passive Corosync/DRBD/XFS/NFS cluster (see >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.highavailability.pacemaker/4672 for >> config details). >> >> I have made some more failover tests, and I see some errors in one case >> that I would like to share. >> >> Initial situation: >> Node 1 is DRBD master, XFS mounted, NFS started >> Node 2 is DRBD slave, Pacemaker DC >> >> If I power off node 2, I get the following logs (filtered on >> drbd/fencing): >> >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in >> time. >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Unknown ) >> conn( Connected -> NetworkFailure ) pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown ) >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: asender terminated >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Terminating asender thread >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: short read expecting header >> on sock: r=-512 >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Creating new current UUID >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Connection closed >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: helper command: /sbin/drbdadm >> fence-peer minor-0 >> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa crm-fence-peer.sh[11711]: invoked for nfs > > You'll get much better support at the list which is about > Redhat's cman. People don't know much about the Redhat fencing > modules here.
Isn't that a drbd script? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker