Hello, I'm trying to make a active/passive dhcp server.
Currently, it works with the following setup : * 2 debian servers with pacemaker : node1 with physical ip1 and virtual ip vip1 (managed with pacemaker) node2 with physical ip2. * 1 lsb dhcp3-server resource that is on node1 and migrates ok on node2, * a rsync cron gets the dhcp lease file from node1 to node2 in order not to start an empty dhcp lease file, * the server should be delivering dhcp lease with vip1 because it is on a vlan and core router use cisco ip helper to send dhcp requests. The problem is that when node1 come online again, there's a difference in the dhcp lease file. I think that using rsync to synchronize the lease file is not the best solution and that a clustered file system is the best solution. What are your opinions about such a setup ? Are there some "best practices" ? Thanks for your help and informations about this. -- Emmanuel Lesouef _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
