Thanks for the answer.
Ivan -----Mensaje original----- De: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:[email protected]] Enviado el: lunes, 19 de abril de 2010 13:26 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service? Hi, On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 06:01:17PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ivan Coronado <[email protected]> wrote: > > And why is a better choice? How I can know? > > The OCF standard is better in many ways, including its support for > parameters and the error codes it returns. LSB class is normal init scripts which may not be very robust. The OCF class agents were designed and implemented for use in clusters. Thanks, Dejan > The pacemaker docs include a section on each of the supported resource classes. > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
