On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:36 AM, nozawat <noza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >> Is this data all from the CIB process? >> What was the load from the other processes like? (Ie. using top) > The cib process was approximately 100% CPU rates of use, > but most of the other processes did not use a CPU when they confirmed it in > top. > The number of the cores of the CPU assigns 2. > >>> Is there the method to make these processing early? >> You mean faster? > Uh...For example, I thought in a parameter like "batch-limit".. > Because I feel that the handling of XML is not so early...
My brain might be a little bit fuzzy from the vacation, but I'm still not 100% sure what you mean here... > >> Could you attach the CIB your cluster was using so I can have a go? > I'm sorry.cib.xml was not able to send a e-mail by the limit of the attached > file. > I compress a file and put it in Bugzilla. > - cib.xml :http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=1684 > - systemtap:http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=1685 Great. I'll follow up there once I finish making my way through my email backlog. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
