Hi Raoul,

2010/9/28 Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <r.bha...@ipax.at> 
> wrote:
>> On 09/23/2010 09:28 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> The good news is that 1.1.3 doesn't have that behavior.
>>> Lets see how 1.0 goes once all the relevant patches have been backported.
>>
>> thanks for your answer! will those patches make it into 1.0.10 or
>> do you have another eta for this?

This should have been fix with this:
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/5fe02f48c47b

The patch has been already backported to the 1.0 repository and will
be included in 1.0.10.
Will you test with the tip of 1.0 repository if you have any chance?

Thanks,

>
> MORI-san from NTT is currently working on the backports.
> we'll delay .10 until he has a chance to complete the process :-)
-- 
Keisuke MORI

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

Reply via email to