On 27 October 2010 19:46, Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I > expected. > > test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource move on > that resource > result node it was fenced and resource was started on the other node > > test2 using firewall to break the heartbeat links on node with resource > result node it was fenced and resource was started on the other node > > As Dejan suggested I am going to run the same type of tests when 1 fence > resource is used. > In this test I will try to cause a fencing on the node which has fencing > resource running on it and see if pacemaker moves the resource before it > fences the node. > > > > I did the same tests without cloning and pacemaker moves fencing resource before triggers a reboot on the node where fencing resource was running. So, cloning fencing resource and having just one fence resource have the same behaviour! at least for these 2 tests. now I don't know which configuration solution I should choose! Cheers, Pavlos
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
