Hi, On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:09:36PM +0200, Guillaume Chanaud wrote: > Hello, > > i have a cluster of two master/slave drbd server running into a vlan > (machines are dedicated servers) > (filer1 and filer2) > I added a third node to the cluster (a "blank node" for the moment) > correctly > (server1) > When i add a 4th node to the cluster (which is a "mirror" of server1) > (server2) > this node start as standalone...Here is the message.log : > > Oct 28 15:59:27 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [TOTEM ] A processor > joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed. > Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] notice: > pcmk_peer_update: Transitional membership event on ring 945392: > memb=1, new=0, lost=0 > Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] info: > pcmk_peer_update: memb: server2 16820416 > Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] notice: > pcmk_peer_update: Stable membership event on ring 945392: memb=1, > new=0, lost=0 > Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] info: > pcmk_peer_update: MEMB: server2 16820416 > Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [TOTEM ] A processor > joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed. > Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] notice: > pcmk_peer_update: Transitional membership event on ring 945416: > memb=1, new=0, lost=0 > Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] info: > pcmk_peer_update: memb: server2 16820416 > Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] notice: > pcmk_peer_update: Stable membership event on ring 945416: memb=1, > new=0, lost=0 > Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]: [pcmk ] info: > pcmk_peer_update: MEMB: server2 16820416 > > [...] Message repeat many many times > > Now i stop the server1, and i start the server2...server2 start > correctly and is added to the cluster...but when > i want to start server1, same thing happens...(so things are > inverted but result is the same...when i start one the serverX, the > other can't start...) > > My corosync.conf is configured in broadcast, not multicast....I have > lots of problem with multicast because lots of briged VM on the vlan > doesn't see the multicast packets, or doesn't join the multicast > group correctly... > > Any hint on this ??
I can vaguely recall problems with vlan and corosync (with multicast). Any chance of trying this without vlan? Otherwise, you will find better audience at the openais mailing list for corosync/openais issues. Thanks, Dejan > Guillaume > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker