On 2 November 2010 12:58, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: [...snip...]
> > > Do you know under which conditions pacemaker initiates multiple > connections > > to a fencing device? > > There are no specific conditions. It can happen by chance because > individual clone instances run independently. > > > The cloned resource will fence a node a bit faster in a case stonith > > > > resource is running on the node to be fenced, there is no need to > move > > > the > > > > resource to another node and then fence the node. > > > > > > Did you measure the time it takes to start the stonith resource? > > > > > > > The last time I tested it was with rackpdu and it took 5 secs for > pacemaker > > to move the resource and trigger the reboot event. > > So, the time difference is 5 seconds in your case, right? > > > No, this is the time it took to fence a node with non-cloned version. I don't remember exactly how many secs it took with cloned version, but I do remember that it was faster. When I get the new PDU (aviosys 9258) I will run the test again and get back on this. Cheers, Pavlos
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
