On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Nikola Ciprich <[email protected]> wrote: >> well, I was using 1.1.3 for a while, but I reverted to 1.0 line for >> stability reasons. >> furthermore, from what andrew said, 1.1.4 needs newer glib2 which complicates >> things for us conservative people even more :) >> but if the bug is really fixed in 1.1.4, it could be possible to backport >> the patch. >> i'll have a look to mercurial, and report. > Hmm, > I guess it could be this patch: > 10339:3d2a39c03666 > but it doesn't apply cleanly and fixing it will certainly require somewhat > deeper > knowledge of pacemaker internals... > Andrew, do You think fix could get into 1.0 branch as well?
yes, but probably not for .10 > If it's the one > I need at all? quite likely > n. > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > Ing. Nikola CIPRICH > LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. > 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava > > tel.: +420 596 603 142 > fax: +420 596 621 273 > mobil: +420 777 093 799 > > www.linuxbox.cz > > mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 > email servis: [email protected] > ------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
