On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Alan Jones <falanclus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Alan Jones <falanclus...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>>> colocation X-Y -2: X Y >>>>> colocation Y-X -2: Y X >>>> >>>> the second one is implied by the first and is therefore redundant >>> >>> If only that were true! >> >> It is. I know exactly how my code works in this regard. >> More than likely a score of -2 is simply too low to have any effect. > > I have tried larger values. If you know of a value that *should* > work, please share it.
INFINITY > I wish to be able to predict the behavior, so arbitrary values are not > acceptable. > It is either large enough to overcome competing values or not. > In this configuration I've set the default resource stickyness to zero and > set a > node location rule per resource to one. It is clear from the logs > that the -2 is > not being applied. I also tried unique large numbers to see if I > could trace their > propagation, e.g. -1965, with no effect. > If you have time to look at this, I will have to create sanitized > versions of logs > and configuration, etc. Let me know. > Alan > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker