On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Keisuke MORI <keisuke.mori...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>>> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's >>>>> attention to a couple of updates that went out today. >> >> Congratulations for the 1.0.10 release! >> It is the great excitement for us too, >> but one thing I would like to comment... >> >> >> 2010/11/13 Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>: >>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchep...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>> STABLE_SERIES = stable-1.0 >>>> >>>> RPM_ROOT = $(shell pwd) >>>> diff -r 99f5a1e61667 configure.ac >>>> --- a/configure.ac Fri Nov 12 09:12:32 2010 +0100 >>>> +++ b/configure.ac Fri Nov 12 11:47:28 2010 -0500 >>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ >>>> dnl checks for library functions >>>> dnl checks for system services >>>> >>>> -AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.9, pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org) >>>> +AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.10, pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org) >>> >>> thats kinda annoying but not crucial. thanks for pointing it out >>> >> >> This would be confusing for users to tell which version they're >> actually using when they are going to report a problem because all the >> logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9". >> >> Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix? > > Oh, I forgot about crm_mon. > I'll see what I can do. >
Happily a change to the spec file is all that was needed. New rpms should be available for all platforms _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
