On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tim Serong <tser...@novell.com> wrote: > Can you elaborate on why you want this particular behaviour? Maybe > there's some other way to approach the problem?
I have explained the issue as clearly as I know how. The problem is fundamental to the design of the policy engine in Pacemaker. It performs only two passes to resolve constraints, when what is required for general purpose constraint resolution is an iterative model. These problems have been addressed in the literature for decades. Alan _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
