Hi, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:50:00AM -0500, Eliot Gable wrote: > > > That's intentional, see: > > > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/glue/rev/5ef3f9370458 > > > > You really don't want to rely on SSH STONITH in a production environment. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > Sure, but I'm in a lab environment at the moment without > UPS-based STONITH capabilities, so having SSH STONITH working > to test things out would be helpful.
The development package should contain external/ssh. > Also, even in production, > what would be the harm of having both SSH and UPS-based STONITH > available? Wouldn't more routes to STONITH a node be better? No. external/ssh simply cannot be relied on. Thanks, Dejan > CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and should > be destroyed and/or returned if you are not the intended and proper recipient. > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker