On 2011-02-14 22:37, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote: > Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit: >>> -Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new >>> deployments ? (I read something along that line) >> >> pretty much >> >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/FAQ#Should_I_Run_Pacemaker_on_Heartbeat_or_Coroysnc.3F >> > > That was the place I was referring to. Still, the thing is pretty > confusing. DR-BD talks about heartbeat in its description.
Happy to take a patch for the User's Guide. > When > you install pacemaker using package managers, heartbeat is in the > dependency list. And goes on... Only on Debian/Ubuntu, which has a dependency on corosync OR heartbeat -- something that many other distros don't even support --, all of which is to make rolling upgrades from the previous major release possible -- something that no other distro supports. Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
