On 2011-06-22 14:02, Felix Frank wrote: > It's good to know that it's possible to engineer another safe-guard > against this problem. Seeing as enough care during manual interventions > will keep us save, this issue is settled from my point of view. An > enhanced RA would be appreciated, of course.
It's not the RA that can be enhanced, at this point. An update to the OCF spec, and Pacemaker actually implementing that updated spec, would be a prerequisite for any RA improvements. That is, again, unless I've missed something obvious. Cheers, Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
