I see, thanks! On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> wrote:
> On 2011-11-01 23:11, Chris Clifton wrote: > > Does the bug with centos 6 still exist as far as recovery/failover goes ? > > What bug? If you're referring to the fact that Corosync rings don't > auto-recover when the network connection is reinstated after a failure, > then that's not a bug, but a missing feature. Said feature was added in > Corosync 1.4; if you're on any prior version then there is no automatic > ring recovery. > > Cheers, > Florian > > -- > Need help with Corosync? > http://www.hastexo.com/knowledge/corosync > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker