Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 11:34:39 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
I've spent the last month or so building linux clusters. 2 of them in
a VM environment on fedora 15. I went through the Clusters from
Scratch Tutorial; which sort of worked. At this time I am looking for
a sanity check.
My requirements are to have a 4 node load balanced cluster with
shard access to a SAN volume. The SAN will be using GFS2.
I believe I need corosync, Openais, PaceMaker, and GFS2 utilities.
Where the confusion is coming from is the use of CMAN in the clusters
from scratch. It seems from what I am reading that Pacemaker should
be able to do everything I need and I am wondering if the use of cman
is old information.
Any thoughts comments or suggestiosn are greatly appreciated, Thanks
in advance.
No, CMAN is the new information. Theres a nasty bug out there (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/openais@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg05600.html)
if you setup pacemaker 1.1 without the new MCP stuff. Best solution is
to switch to CMAN. See
http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for<http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for>
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
