On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/11 15:55, Gao,Yan wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> As some people have noticed, we've provided a new feature "Resource >>>>>>> templates" since pacemaker-1.1.6. I made a document about it which is >>>>>>> meant to be included into "Pacemaker_Explained". I borrowed the >>>>>>> materials from Tanja Roth , Thomas Schraitle, (-- the documentation >>>>>>> specialists from SUSE) and Dejan Muhamedagic. Thanks to them! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Attaching it here first. If you are interested, please help review it. >>>>>>> And if anyone would like to help convert it into DocBook and made a >>>>>>> patch, I would be much appreciate. :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can tell people would like to see a crm shell version of it as well. >>>>>>> I'll sort it out and post it here soon. >>>>>> Attached the crm shell version of the document. >>>>> >>>>> As much as I appreciate the new feature, was it really necessary that >>>>> you re-used a term that already has a defined meaning in the shell? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html#_templates >>>>> >>>>> Couldn't you have called them "resource prototypes" instead? We've >>>>> already confused users enough in the past. >>>> Since Dejan adopted the object name "rsc_template" in crm shell, and >>>> call it "Resource template" in the help. I'm not inclined to use another >>>> term in the document. Opinion, Dejan? >>> >>> I didn't mean to suggest to use a term in the documentation that's >>> different from the one the shell uses. I am suggesting to rename the >>> feature altogether. Granted, it may be a bit late to have a naming >>> discussion now, but I haven't seen this feature discussed on the list >>> at all, so there wasn't really a chance to voice these concerns >>> sooner. >> Actually there were discussions in pcmk-devel mailing list. Given that >> it has been included into "pacemaker-1.2" schema and released with >> pacemaker-1.1.6, it seems too late for us to change it from cib side >> now > > Technically its not yet in the 1.2 area, that change was pending on > this documentation update. OK then. I would like to hear more voices about that, since Dejan and Tim have been working on this for quite some time too.
Regards, Gaoyan -- Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
