On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > 21.12.2011 06:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, all, >>> >>> I'm now testing latest changes in git, everything goes much cleaner then >>> a week ago, I'll (hopefully) make report later. >>> >>> One feature came into mind during testing: >>> Imagine resource which was tried to be started on all nodes and failed >>> everywhere. >>> Then administrator changes resource definition to fix start problem. >>> Now, resource is not tried to start until it is cleaned up (or both its >>> failure-timeout passes and cluster state re-checked). >>> Idea is to make automatic resource cleanup after definition change. >> >> Not good if the device wasn't failed. >> Imagine someone changing the 'ip' for an IPaddr resource, the old >> value would never be removed. > > I meant only failed resources.
I guess the PE could have enough information for this. File a BZ? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
