Hi, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Attila Megyeri <amegy...@minerva-soft.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > My syslogs are full of messages like this: > > > > Jan 7 23:55:47 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:48 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:48 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:48 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:49 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:49 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:49 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:50 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:50 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:50 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:51 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:51 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:51 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:52 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:52 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > Jan 7 23:55:52 oa2 corosync[362]: [TOTEM ] received message requesting > test of ring now active > > > > > > What could be the reason for this? > > > > > > Pacemaker 1.1.6, Corosync 1.4.2 > > > > > > The relevant part of the config: > > > > Eth0 is ont he 10.100.1.X subnet, eth1 is 192.168.100.X > > > > > > > > > > totem { > > version: 2 > > secauth: off > > threads: 0 > > rrp_mode: passive > > interface { > > ringnumber: 0 > > bindnetaddr: 10.100.1.255 > > mcastaddr: 226.100.40.1 > > mcastport: 4000 > > } > > interface { > > ringnumber: 1 > > bindnetaddr: 192.168.100.255 > > mcastaddr: 226.101.40.1 > > mcastport: 4000 > > } >
Are the subnets /24 or higher (/23, /22, etc.)? Because as I see you're using what would be the broadcast address on a /24 subnet and may cause issues. > > > > > } > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Attila > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > -- Dan Frincu CCNA, RHCE _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org