On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:37:39AM +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are using a pacemaker 1.0.5-4.7
1.0.5 is pretty long in the tooth. Please consider something a little more recent. > with heartbeat 3.0.0-33.10 >> and a drbd device on a CentOS 5.7 webserver-cluster. When the >> active node gets under heavy load, the cluster sometimes starts >> to failover. > > What does failover? Resources? All resources? Is the node > considered down/lost? > >> Is there a way to make this behavior less >> sensitive like changing the retry/recheck time/counter ? > > Indeed there is, but depends on what's happening. If it's on a > heartbeat level, then you need to tweak ha.cf. If on a resource > level, then I guess monitor timeouts. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > >> Any Suggestions are welcome >> >> kind regards >> >> fatcharly >> -- >> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir >> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
