In the dnsmasq.conf file I have

listen-address=127.0.0.1
listen-address=192.168.1.250

Where 192.168.1.250 is the virtual IP.

Otherwise, I think it will listen on all interfaces.

On 3/24/2012 7:22 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Or if there's a way to get your dnsmasq server to bind to a specific IP address, that's an even better solution.


On 3/23/2012 8:27 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
I'd guess that your replies are going back with the wrong source IP
address on them and the Windows clients are being picky about accepting
them. Perhaps you need to investigate ocf:heartbeat:IPsrcaddr


On 24/03/12 01:35, Gregg Stock wrote:
I'm have some "interesting" behavior with a pacemaker managed DNS
server.  Here is the basic setup:

primitive p_dnsmasq lsb:dnsmasq \
          op monitor interval="60s" timeout="30s"
primitive p_ip_dnsmasq ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
          params ip="192.168.1.250" cidr_netmask="24" \
          op monitor interval="10s"
order o_ip_before_dns inf: p_ip_dnsmasq p_dnsmasq

The cluster seems to manage the resource ok.

If the dnsmasq server is running on the hosts regular ip address,
everything is fine. When switching to the cluster managed ip address, I
get the following behavior on our network. The behavior was the same for various permutation of the listening addresses in the dnsmasq.conf file.

1. Linux hosts are fine.
2. Windows and Mac hosts can ping the DNS server but don't get DNS
service. I was able to verify that the requests were getting to the DNS
server but the replies were getting and ICMP destination unreachable on
the way back.

I was able fine a tidbit of information here
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2010q2/003906.html

          A destination unreachable ICMP reply is normally generated by
the kernel
          when there is nothing listening on that port. The most likely
reason for
          that is that the dnsmasq process no longer exists. If that's
the case
the problem changes into "find why the dnsmasq daemon is exiting".

This doesn't seem to be completely applicable because the dnsmasq daemon
is running.

Any additional information required?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Gregg Stock




_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to