Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: > i haven't seen such issue during my current tests. > >> Is ext4 unsuitable for such a setup? Or is the linux nfs3 implementation >> broken? Are buffers too large such that one has too wait too long for a >> flush? > > Maybe I'll have the time to switch form xfs to ext4 and retest > during the next couple of days. But I cannot guarantee anything. > > Maybe you could try switching to XFS instead?
Thanks for the numbers. I just see that a local dd on the server also achieves up to 450 MBytes/s. So it seems to be NFS related. Christoph _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
