On 07/02/2012 08:28 PM, Phil Frost wrote: > On 07/02/2012 12:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> What is being mangled actually? The crm shell does what is >> possible given the pacemaker RNG schema. It is unfortunate that >> the design is slightly off, but that cannot be fixed in the crm >> syntax. > > I will demonstrate my point by offering a quiz to the list. Tell me, > without running these examples, what effect they will have: > > [1] colocation foo inf: a b ( c:Master d )
whenever you change the Role an extra set is created .... no different roles in a resource set ... and between colocation-sets the direction of dependencies is like in a simple 2-resource colocation Regards, Andreas -- Need help with Pacemaker? http://www.hastexo.com/now > [2] colocation foo inf: a b > [3] colocation foo inf: a b c > [4] colocation foo inf: a b c:Master > > Hints: > > - there are three resource sets in [1] > - [2] is not a subnet of [3] > - [4] is not ordered a, b, c > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
